Dr Mansoor Ali answers your queries related to homeopathic education, homeopathic treatment, competitive exams, job opportunities etc.
He is an experienced and qualified Homoeopathic practitioner and teacher, born and brought up at Calicut , a district in Kerala, (India).
Now working at the prestigious Govt. Homoeopathic Medical College Calicut as Associate Professor in Department of Casetaking and Repertorisation.
Post your queries below
sir i had completed my BHMS 3 yrs before so i want to know if there are any good jobs for me in indore , an also wat other courses should i do for my future so that it will be helpful for me. THNK U
Sir,
I am a BHMS doctor want to know about 1year course in maharastra which give me permission to practice modern medicine also.
Please mail me details about this course.
thanks
Not started
I am just a homeopathy lover and reading lots of homeopathic books to grow my knowledge. I wanted some guidance if I can find any book with Chronic cases treated with homeopathy, which can help me in knowing better. I want to study through correspondese as hobby.
The following guidelines are a summary of how I needed Chronic cases treated (at least 10 chronic cases with two follow ups, taken over at least six months). Cases reports should be with full evaluation of the case taking and analysis skills which can help me with my studies. I would pay the fees if applicable, if you can email me the case history reports with classical homeopathy treatments of chronic cases.
Content of Case
Cases with clear indications where only one remedy at a time was given with only 1-3 total remedies used in the entire case. Avoid cases where many different remedies were given over a short period of time, or the results from the remedy were unclear.
Marked Improvement
Select cases where marked, sustained, undeniable improvement was evidently attributable to successful homeopathic care and describe the assessment and analysis in paragraph format so that I can understand the thought process. In the follow ups, demonstrate the abilities in case management with written support and explanation for remedy choices and changes. Where applicable, identify the intensity of the original symptom, and the degree of improvement. I did not wanted the cases which have no concrete evidence of improvement, e.g. if the subject says he is feeling better, but there is no improvement in physical or general symptoms.
Length
Submit the relevant information from the initial case taken, including the language of the client, family history, review of general and particular symptoms. This is to demonstrate my ability to take a thorough case. Case notes alone will not help me. A brief summary of the case in more than one page will help better understanding.
Classical
Cases that demonstrate the effective use of classical homeopathy, following classical homeopathic principles. Avoid cases that include non-classical approaches such as the use of combination remedies or the use of multiple remedies given at the same time, or remedies chosen without analysis matching the symptoms to known remedy. Cases that do not follow classical guidelines of one remedy at a time and working with Law of Similars will not be accepted.
Explanation
Cases that involve evaluation and analysis that can be clearly explained. Detailed discussion of how the practitioner thinks about the case and the remedies involved is very important. Skip cases that, though clearly successful, do not involve an explainable thought process. Cases that were determined by unexplainable intuition or serendipitous coincidence do not provide me with an opportunity to evaluate the homeopath’s skills.
Professional
Cases would be written in complete sentences, edited for misspellings, grammar, etc., if possible.
Repertorization
With a repertorization covering the main elements or essence of the case, according to the analysis style for use. Specifying which repertory was used. Having the rubrics with correct notation, exactly as listed in the repertory. Including the repertorization even if it did not finally lead to the remedy. It would be better not to list the symptoms rather than a specific rubric, leaving me to guess which rubric was chosen. Having the repertory section name or sub-rubric details when writing rubrics.
Materia Medica Differential
Having review 2 – 5 remedy choices considered for the initial case, and showing the reasoning for selection of one over another, using concrete arguments for or against each one. These should be the final, serious choices for the case. Specifying the sources used to write the differential. Avoid cases where only one remedy was considered. Opinion statements such as “I felt this remedy was the best for the case,” without supporting arguments to explain why that opinion was held, would be better if avoided.
Remedy Selection
Clearly stating which remedy / potency and method of administration was finally selected, along with the date the subject took the remedy. Don’t give the remedy name without posology or date information.
Follow-Ups
Specifically identify the date of each follow-up. Include information on the status of the chief complaint, and each of the features of the case that led to the initial remedy selection as well as any new features in the case. Use a scale to rate how much better or worse each symptom is. Review the general symptoms of the case. Don’t omit the dates for each encounter. Avoid cases where there is not clear follow-up showing improvement of the important aspects of the case.
Waiting for your reply and thanking for your kind act in advance.
for admission in post graduate courses in delhi university for year 2013 how many seats are available for a general candiate in all india quota.
No seats
Respected sir, i am doing MD in organon at anand,gujarat.i want to know the date of next UPSC exam,and how to apply for same.