Cabinet nod for amendment of 12(C) of Homoeopathy act

indiaNew Delhi, March 31 – The union cabinet on Tuesday approved a new provision to ensure that homeopathy education is made available only by colleges equipped to guarantee quality – amendment of 12(C) of Homoeopathy act – that allow the Government to withdraw the admission to the colleges who has not satisfying the MSR Regulations – so no amnesty from 2015 onward.

Currently Government cannot withdraw the recognition of Homoeopathy Medical Colleges which are lacking in  infra-structure

The decision was taken by the union cabinet at a meeting here under the chairmanship of Prime Minister Narendra Modi.

” It will now be required for all homeopathy colleges to seek the central government’s permission for undertaking annual admissions.”

The amendment to the Homeopathy Central Council Act, 1973, will make provisions relating to granting permission by central government to all homeopathic medical colleges for continuing course/courses, so as to ensure that homeopathy education is given only through colleges which can impart quality education, said an official statement.

This amendment will also ensure quality homeopathy education leading to better healthcare through the homeopathy system of medicine, the statement said.

This will be placed in parliament in April 2015 itself.

2 Comments

  1. Ha……Haa…….Haaa!!!!!!!!!!!!!! What a nice JOKE?

    Is it all that infrastructure that may provide quality education to the current students of Homoeopathy? No NO never. The quality comes in any field from the EXCELLENCY of brain. It is a lacking element in our education system. Fro example:

    I would like to bring following facts in
    knowledge.

    There are three recognized faculties of
    medicine in India i.e. Allopathy, Ayurvedic & Homœopathy. Out of these
    three faculties, the students two faculties are taught with obsolete data. The
    students of Ayurvedic & Homœopathic faculties are taught with obsolete
    data. Yes! The literature of Ayurveda & Homœopathy has not been updated
    since their inception. The literature of Ayurveda has not been updated since
    about 2500 years. While Homœopathy has not been updated since its inception its
    inception i.e. 200 years. Therefore, the curriculum of them is inharmonious in
    nature.

    For example: The current curriculum
    of UG and PG i.e. BHMS and MD, which is proposed and recommended by the Central
    Council of Homœopathy CCH for the study of students, is fundamentally inharmonious in nature. The knowledge of
    the subjects in question and studies thereof, which are taught in the courses,
    is not compatible with each other. I can’t understand why Homœopaths of Asian origin,
    especially of India, cannot look ahead of Hahnemann. Suppose, if any physician
    presently got the knowledge that equals to the Hahnemann; still he has to
    breathe in the 18th-19th centuries. He shall have no
    knowledge of the even cell, immunity, metabolism or bacteria etc.. If he will
    write anything, certainly he will quote like Hahnemann[1] in his text.

    On account of lack of
    up-gradation, ‘Organon’ is still taught as per understandings of 18th-19th
    century; whilst other subjects are taught in their most updated form. It
    generates a lot of confusion in the mind of pupils. In the classroom of
    ‘Organon’, the teacher, as per guidelines of CCH, taught or give the conceptual (intangible) understanding
    related to diseases and cure; whereas teacher of the pathology tries to impart
    the most accepted basis of the diseases and cure; i.e. cellular, molecular and
    genetic basis of the diseases and cure. It’s a story like such schools, where
    one teacher teaches that, the robbery is an evil and sin; it should not be
    done; whilst in the other classroom, other one says that, if anything is of our
    use, there is no harm in robbing it out. The meaning of education has been lost
    somewhere in the race of money-making. Now, on the name of education only
    information is feed up. But, at least some values must be preserved very
    genuinely.

    I am scientist working
    on medicine since last 40 years. In context of present scenario, I have updated
    the Homœopathic concept. But my updated version, even after appreciation by
    numerous related authorities over the globe, in vain. The concern authorities
    are waiting for some (sum) more recognition. Only then they may think to
    include my updates in curriculum.

    —————————————————————————————————————

    [1] Dr. Hahnemann in the footnote no. 10, in the
    introduction of 6th edition of ‘Organon’, on the page no. 44,
    referring to Mullen, quoted by Birch in the History of the Royal Society,
    inscribed that: “Life was endangered by injecting a little
    pure water into a vein.” Moreover,
    he added that, referring to the Autenrieth, Physiologie, ii,? 784:
    “Even the mildest fluids introduced into the veins endangered life.” It has now proved mistaken notion and wrong.
    Everybody now knows that, as per need and requirement of the patient litters of
    intravenous fluids have injected into veins. Since discovery of bacterial
    existence was not accomplished in his era, he was unaware of the bacterial infection.
    Consequently, due to lack of knowledge, referring to the Med. Comment of
    Edinb., Dec. 2, vol. ii, 1793, in the introduction of 6th edition of
    ‘Organon’, in the footnote no. 10, on the page no. 45, he inscribed that: “A
    girl in Glasgow, eight years of age, having been bit by a mad dog, the surgeon
    immediately cut the piece clean out, and yet thirty-six days afterwards she was
    seized with hydrophobia, which killed her in two days.” Anybody now can assume that, let it be how faster
    surgeon might have executed the amputation operation; it might never be faster
    than the blood circulation of the victim of dog bite. Suppose, if only few
    seconds of time would have consumed in carrying the victim to the surgeon and
    completing the operation by him, which is not possible at all, the blood of
    victim with the pathogenic bacteria certainly might have circulated at least
    hundreds of times in the body. Therefore, ill-fated victim was died of
    hydrophobia and not due to dynamic power. Similarly, on the page no. 45 he
    inscribed that: “The most careful and prompt washing of the
    genitals does not protect the system from infection with the venereal chancrous
    disease.” And that:
    “The slightest breath of air emanating from the body of a person affected with
    smallpox with suffice to produce this horrible disease in a healthy child.” All these inscriptions are good examples of
    the lack of knowledge on the part of Hahnemann. On account of lack of
    knowledge, in the introduction of 6th edition of ‘Organon’, on the
    page no. 46-47, he wrote that: “What ponderable quantity of material
    substance could have been absorbed into the fluids, in order to develop, in the
    first of these instances, a tedious dyscrasia (syphilis), which when uncured is
    only extinguished with the remotest period of life, with death; in the last, a
    disease (smallpox) accompanied by almost general suppuration, and often rapidly
    fatal? In these and all similar cases is it possible to entertain the idea of a
    material morbific matter being introduced into the blood? A letter written in
    the sick-room at a great distance has often communicated the same contagious
    disease to the person who read it. In this instance, can the notion of a
    material morbific matter having penetrated into the fluids be admitted? But
    what need is there of all such proofs?” Moreover he added that: “In these
    cases, where is the material morbific principle that entered in substance into
    the body, there to produce and keep up the disease, and without the material
    expulsion and ejection of which a radical cure were impossible?” All of the above mentioned examples show the
    status of knowledge of the medical science at that time.

    ———————————————————————-

    Sir, for the cause of humanity and
    better treatment of moaning humanity Please sign the petition as a supporter of
    the cause. http://www.change.org/petitions/hon-ble-chief-justice-supreme-court-of-india-health-minister-of-india-speakers-loksabha-rajyasabha-chairman-cch-ccrh-new-delhi-india-please-include-the-most-updated-version-of-organon-of-medicine-i-e-my-organon-of-na%C3%B1o-medicine

    DR. S. HARIMANN.

    INDIA

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*


three × two =